Minor revision.

From my own experience I once reveiced in a row major revision, minor revision, major revision. Two referees accepted, one referee dropped out and the new referee kept raising issues over and over again. After having addressed five extensive review reports we contacted the journal and asked for an editorial decision because the last reviewer ...13 May 2020 ... ... Minor revisionの評価である。 修正、共著者との修正点の確認を済ませ1日で修正原稿を再投稿した。 すぐにEditor判断でacceptされると期待していたら ...$(Major).$(Minor).$(rev:r) Now, everything is working fine. As test, I just set the Build number format to $(rev:.r), and the build number is .x. So, we could confirm that the value of $(rev:.r) including the . by default. Note: Since where Major and Minor are two variables defined in the build pipeline, so we need defined them in the variables ...Note that in the case of either a minor or a major decision, the editor says so explicitly, even if it’s conditional/provisional. From what you have mentioned, it seems that they had considered a possible rejection earlier and that there may be no guarantee of acceptance if you make the changes.The AE will read the revised manuscript and response to reviews carefully to decide whether to recommend to the EIC that the revised manuscript should be: 1) declined, 2) sent back to the original or to new referees for further reviews, 3) accepted without further review but with major or minor revisions, or 4) accepted in its current form ...

Minor revision may undergo referee evaluation; however, in most cases, the editor accepts the paper without sending the revised manuscript to the reviewer. In fine, a careful revision, whether it's for major or minor, brings your paper accepted by the editor. Let us keep in mind that satisfying the queries of reviewers is always difficult ...Instances of this decision are also rather rare. When a paper receives a minor revision decision, it might not be sent for a second round of peer review; usually, the editor goes through the revisions and gives a final approval. However, it is good to remember that an ‘accept with minor revisions’ decision does not guarantee acceptance.

I still can't figure out why the editor sent the manuscript to a different reviewer after the revision; it was a minor revision. One of the reviewers accepted the revised version before this stage ...文章minor revision,小修后提交上去了，with editor了，不知道还会不会送审？ 标签： 送审 小修 文章 提交 还会 泡汤 发急 副教授 着急 编辑 还是编辑直接决定了，真的很着急啊，都2年了，一篇文章没发，急啊！

This fifth edition cancels and replaces the fourth edition (ISO 898-1:2009), of which it constitutes a minor revision. ISO 898 consists of the following parts, under the general title Mechanical properties of fasteners made of ... It is intended that, upon revision, ...Note that in the case of either a minor or a major decision, the editor says so explicitly, even if it’s conditional/provisional. From what you have mentioned, it seems that they had considered a possible rejection earlier and that there may be no guarantee of acceptance if you make the changes.Minor revision. Your article has a very good chance of being accepted for publication, but the reviewers have requested minor amendments to be made. These changes can usually be made quite quickly and it is unlikely we will need to send your revised article back to the reviewers.general, a paper is recommended for minor revision when all reviews are either accept or minor revision. If AE would like to recommend for a minor revision when a manuscript still has a major revision review, AE needs to elaborate on the recommendation and discuss this with EIC. • Choose Major Revision if a paper has real potential, but a ...

Accept after Minor Revisions: The paper is in principle accepted after revision based on the reviewer’s comments. Authors are given five days for minor revisions. Reconsider after Major Revisions: The acceptance of the manuscript would depend on the revisions. The author needs to provide a point by point response or provide a rebuttal if some ...

Sound packs can be downloaded either through companion (the Download dialog will point you to the correct directory for the selected radio type), or from the links below: Sound packs for OpenTX 2.0. Sound packs for OpenTX 2.1. SD card contents for OpenTX 2.2, with sound packs. SD card contents for OpenTX 2.3, with sound packs.

Confidently (and pleasantly) say to your client something like this: "Since your request comes after we've completed the agreed upon rounds of revisions, I will have to charge you for this." Short and simple. 11. Don't waste your time with the wrong clients.Accept without revision. Accept with minor essential revisions. Major compulsory revision requested. Reject because scientifically or ethically unsound. Reject ...Journal overview. Pavement Engineering is important for facilitating national and international movement of people, services, and goods. Building and preserving efficient, reliable, and sustainable highway and airport pavement systems is crucial for economic and social development. The International Journal of Pavement …1. Accept without revision: Very rarely, an article will be accepted for publication without any revisions requested. 2. Minor revisions needed: The article is mostly sound, but with some small changes required to the argument, interpretation of the results, or references. Minor revisions might include:9 Şub 2023 ... minor revision（マイナーリビジョン） とは、文字通り、それほど重大ではないが修正箇所があるという査読結果です。指摘された箇所をきちんと修正し、 ...For submissions with the accept with minor revisions, authors must include minor revisions requested by the reviewers and submit by the 1st round camera ready deadline. 1AC will check the revised manuscript for final approval. In case revisions are not sufficient, 1AC will communicate with authors, and authors should respond quickly. ...

二、“小修”——Minor Revision 当看到论文的修改意见是小修，代表要修改的问题不大，小范围做修改就能达标了。 当你的论文被编辑指出需要作出“小修”，那就意味着论文编辑论文几乎不会回到最初的同行评审那里进行进一步评论。Accept without revision. Accept with minor essential revisions. Major compulsory revision requested. Reject because scientifically or ethically unsound. Reject ...Solution 2. Yes, characterizing revisions as "minor" strongly suggests that if you make those revisions the paper will be accepted. Editors may prefer not to explicitly say that the paper is "accepted with minor revisions", because authors may make "minor revisions" that don't correct the problems, and then feel that they've been promised ...There are gravitational field and baryonic matter (star, planet, gases etc.) in our world; gravitational field is much more fundamental for that the relativistic mass of the gravitational field of a neutron star is almost 1021 times the mass of the neutron star. And, it is astonishing that the relativistic mass density of the gravitational field on the surface of a …CS7034 The specified version string does not conform to the required format - major[.minor[.build[.revision]]] Code language: plaintext (plaintext) There are 86400 seconds per day and 1440 minutes per day. This is why I chose Minutes Since Midnight instead of Seconds Since Midnight. Since 86400 > the limit of 65534, using seconds …I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. there were two reviewers, reviewer#1 said `The authors have made all the modifications indicated.

Even the best papers could sometimes receive a major revision or rejection after an initial minor revision request. It all depends on the editor to adjudge the comments base on the merit of the paper.

Accept With Minor Revisions This decision means that a manuscript is acceptable for publication if some minor revisions can be made to improve the quality of the content and writing. The author is told that the manuscript has been reviewed very positively and the manuscript can be published if it is revised in response to the reviewers’ concerns.I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. there were two reviewers, reviewer#1 said `The authors have made all the modifications indicated. Current Psychology is an international forum for rapid dissemination of peer-reviewed research at the cutting edge of psychology. It welcomes significant and rigorous empirical and theoretical contributions from all the major areas of psychology, including but not limited to: cognitive psychology and cognition, social, clinical, health, developmental, …After getting a moderate revision for the manuscript and resubmitting it, it is possible to get moderate revision again, or minor revision, or accept directly without any further edits. It is rare ... 15 - Major Revision. 0 - Minor Revision. 54 - Patch number. generic - Distribution specific information. Using hostnamectl command # The hostnamectl utility is part of systemd, and it is used to query and change the system hostname. It also displays the Linux distribution and kernel version: hostnamectlCurrent Psychology is an international forum for rapid dissemination of peer-reviewed research at the cutting edge of psychology. It welcomes significant and rigorous empirical and theoretical contributions from all the major areas of psychology, including but not limited to: cognitive psychology and cognition, social, clinical, health, developmental, …So we sent query to the editor. After sending the query, the reviewers' comments came just within 4 days suggesting a minor revision. We sent the manuscript with minor revision but now it is again under revision for 15 days. Now, from my earlier experience, I am worried uf they again take 5 months to review a minor revision, or suggest ...Registry. If you don’t want to open up PowerShell itself, you can also check the registry. The version of PowerShell is tucked away under a value in the registry key path HKLM:\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\PowerShell\3\PowerShellEngine. This registry key has a value called PowerShellVersion that you can reference by using Get-ItemProperty.

After one round of revision and resubmission, the primary editor typically makes a final publication decision. The outcome will be Accept, Accept with Minor Revisions, or Reject. None of these decisions require re-review. Step 6: Copyediting Manuscripts accepted for publication are then copyedited, approved by the authors, and then published in ...

So we sent query to the editor. After sending the query, the reviewers' comments came just within 4 days suggesting a minor revision. We sent the manuscript with minor revision but now it is again under revision for 15 days. Now, from my earlier experience, I am worried uf they again take 5 months to review a minor revision, or suggest ...

I submitted my manuscript on April 26th and I got the major revision in the first round and “accept after minor revision” in the second round. After submitting the minor revision, the statutes changed to the pending editorial decision for 1 month. All of the sudden the statues changed to the revised version review from yesterday.3) Minor Revision. The article contains a small number of easily correctable errors including grammar, missing ref-erences, and minor content clarification. 4) Not Suitable for Publication. The article is not suitable for publication. It does not offer any value to the readers of IEEE Potentials or its subject is so thoroughly incoher-Major revisions: The editor asks for you to make some major changes to the paper. "Major revision" usually is something that requires new research (e.g., collecting more data, running a second study, or doing some complicated new analysis), unlike "minor revision" which is usually just changing the writing within the paper.When a revision is requested after peer review, the authors must return the revised manuscript promptly: 14 days is allotted for minor revisions of both Articles and Communications, 30 days for major revisions of Articles, and 21 days for major revisions of Communications.As we’ve seen, avoiding minor corrections is about ensuring that your thesis is as error-free as possible. While the odd typo is inevitable and likely to be overlooked, repeated errors of spelling, grammar and punctuation will distract the reader from the message you’re trying to communicate. You might consider using an editorial service ...Authors may choose to revise and resubmit such papers to NDSS 2024, with appropriate revisions and within six weeks after notification (see specific deadlines below). The revision and second-review of “Major Revision” papers will be based on a list of “revision tasks” clearly specified by the original reviewers and conveyed to authors upon notification.Aug 25, 2021 · I have a paper which was invited to be resubmitted after minor revisions. Normally, the editor decides the outcome after this. In this case, however, the status went back to under review after I resubmitted. Does this mean it got sent to reviewers or the editor is evaluating it? Any experience here? It’s an Elsevier journal. Journal overview. Pavement Engineering is important for facilitating national and international movement of people, services, and goods. Building and preserving efficient, reliable, and sustainable highway and airport pavement systems is crucial for economic and social development. The International Journal of Pavement …Minor revision = confident the authors can take care of any issues without the key findings changing, don't need to see manuscript again.Minor revisions - the best you can hope for after the first round of review Major revisions - the decision we received in this case Reject - clearly, the one you want to avoid; Editors are most likely to write back to you after initial review and recommend either 'minor revisions' or 'major revisions' to your paper. The big difference ...

Oct 11, 2023 · Yes. Our Editorial Office may agree to extended revision time, provided that the authors send their request to the in-house Assistant Editor. MDPI has one of the most straightforward and efficient publication processes in the whole publishing landscape. Most of our journals suggest 5 days for minor revisions and 10–14 days for major revisions. In some cases a complete re-write is required based on suggestions made by the referees. A complete re-write will take considerable time and needs to be done systematically so that the re-submission is a definitive “re-write” and not just a collection of “minor” revisions. Help!The build number, or -1 if the build number is undefined. Examples. The following code example demonstrates the Version constructor, and Major, Minor, Build, Revision, MajorRevision, and MinorRevision properties.I received the editor's comments as follows: The revised version of your manuscript xxx has been reviewed by our referees. Referee A is now satisfied with your paper, while Referee B is more or ...Instagram:https://instagram. yaquina bay tides 2022ku football bowl game 2022larry brown championshipswhite or asian Do a careful final check. In summary, a decision of ‘minor revisions required’ is a very good outcome for a submitted article. Take your time, however, to ensure that you do make all requested changes and write a comprehensive ‘response to reviews’ document. Do a careful final check (including a careful spelling check) before sending ... who won the kentucky kansas gamestd testing lawrence How long should I wait for a paper under minor revision to get a decision? Detailed Question -. I received a letter from the Editor stating that although my work is …For submissions with the accept with minor revisions, authors must include minor revisions requested by the reviewers and submit by the 1st round camera ready deadline. 1AC will check the revised manuscript for final approval. In case revisions are not sufficient, 1AC will communicate with authors, and authors should respond quickly. ... kansas coach basketball The language follows the requirements of the Guide for Authors. The number of words and of figures/tables is within limits: • Research article: 7500 words, 6 tables and figures combined. • Review article: 10 000 words, 6 tables and figures combined. • Short communication: 3000 words, 6 tables and figures combined.Aug 11, 2020 · Apart from that, note that editors have a lot of manuscripts to go through at various stages of consideration and publication, even more so in the case of a top-rung journal. This too explain the delay in picking up your revised manuscript. Coming to your other queries, it should be fine to write to the editor about now, as two weeks have ... revision definition: 1. a change that is made to something, or the process of doing this: 2. study of work you have…. Learn more.